The Utah Legislature recently passed a “bell-to-bell” cellphone ban last month. Senate bill 69 was passed unanimously in the Senate, and 46 to 21 in the House. If signed by Governor Cox, the law will take effect on July 1.
SB69 restricts cellphone use K-12 from the opening bell to the morning bell, completely eliminating cellphone use during school hours.
Sen. Lincoln Fillmore (Salt Lake) said that SB69 is not necessarily a ban, but will however be the established default to follow. School districts are still in control of setting their own policies, exceptions of phone usage in cases of emergency (to use the SafeUT Crisis Line, for example) or for medical necessities will be permissible. Parents of students can make a request for an accommodation that allows their child to use their cellphone briefly in a designated area of the school and during non-instructional time.
“Cell phones are addictive and dangerous, and just like with other addictive, dangerous things like alcohol, drugs, cigarettes, they don’t really belong in schools,” Fillmore said.
Sen. Fillmore now decided to expand the policy after successfully setting a statewide phone policy during schools in the previous year. The original policy banned phones during class time, but were allowed during hall pass and at lunch. Governor Cox believes that the previous policy was not helpful enough in helping students get away from their phones. Thus leading to the expansion of SB69 or the “bell-to-bell” law.
“The issue wasn’t necessarily being distracted in class because teachers can kind of manage that,” Fillmore said. “The issue really is about the social and mental health of students and if kids during their break time are all staring down at their phones instead of talking to each other, it really limits social development and mental health.”
While enforcing the previous policy at NS, other schools such as Granger High had already had a bell-to-bell ban put in place in 2024. Reporting that attendance rates and test scores went up, while bullying incidents went down, according to a recent Fox 13 news article.
The purpose of SB69 is to eliminate digital distractions by encouraging a focused and socially connected environment.
“No matter how engaging or entertaining a teacher may be or try to be,” instructional coach Dax Higgins said, “they will never be able to compete with the phone in a student's hand that acts as a genie in a bottle that can give them anything they want right there.”
SB69 never states any type of storage method for phones and due to the fact that there will be no funding with this bill, schools are required to develop their own system. The most effective ones found have been magnetic locking pouches. Other schools have resorted to phone lockers and cubbies or the cheapest option of “Off and Away,” where a phone stays turned off and held in the students backpack.
The leeway that the previous bill had on cell phones is clearly shown as students walk to class with their heads down, hoping for a notification.
“It’s not like everyone in our school is addicted,” sophomore Zoe Evans said, “just checking your phone, it’s like a habit and it’s hard to get rid of that habit.”
NS math teacher Karen Sorensen has noticed a divide between the decrease in connection and student interaction before the cellphone policy was in place.
“Every second they were having free time they were definitely on their phone,” Sorensen said. “I see a lot more connection before classes start and after.”

