His head throbs as he slowly packs up for the day. Hours of working as a graphic designer on the layout for a new website, mixed with sketching
designs and brainstorming stunning visuals, have taken their toll. Suddenly, his boss appears, calling him into her office. The serious expression on her face makes his stomach clench as he hears the last thing he ever thought he would, “This company is letting you go.”
This is the experience of a graphic designer who was recently fired because of the rise of artificial intelligence in the workplace. This scenario is
one that may become increasingly common in upcoming years. Research conducted by Goldman Sachs shows that generative AI has the ability to automate 26 percent of functions done by individuals in creative industries.
“If AI is going to do it faster and cheaper, why would they not use it?” senior Nila Peterson said. “Which, as someone who wants to [major in
graphic design], it’s really upsetting, honestly, because I think that there’s such a difference with AI, like it doesn’t create the same emotion that a person can.”
According to a recent NS Times survey, 79 percent of students believe that the future of creative careers will be negatively affected by AI. Many
students feel frustrated that their desired career is now not as feasible as it once was. Others worry that even if their future career remains available, it will not use the same roles.
“Before AI was a big thing, I always thought that being [an art teacher] meant connecting with students through that medium,” senior Sage Ivory
said. “ I’m worried that, after a while, it’s going to be something that you can’t really do, and it’s going to be more computer-based. It’s going to be more maximizing that space instead of emotions and connecting through my students that way.”
Others may share the concern that AI will change future innovation. However, even with constantly evolving AI, 61 percent of students at NS still do not believe that AI will replace human creativity.
“For some reason, as people we still like things that are touched by men more than we do by computer,” art teacher Paul Allred said. “That is the
important part. It’s like a painting. We still have more of a connection when it’s made by man versus a computer. There’s something in us that has to create.”
Some students believe AI is shifting art into more of a profit-based area instead of a form of self-expression and attachment.
“Art has always been a way for people to express themselves and for people to find almost that connection,” Ivory said. “It identifies so much
culture and so much of the human experience around the world. To not have that is just turning us into clones of each other to not have that sense of relatability, that sense of emotion, that sense of culture through art.”
While many believe AI negatively affects all aspects of the creative industry, it is a valuable tool that can be used to create.
“For better or worse…it does give you a tool to create,” Allred said, “but the AI should not be the brain behind it. It’s a tool. That’s all it should be is a tool, not a finished product.”

